Gorilla Journal 32, June 2006
Other Nations
For the animal shall not be measured by man. In a world
older and more complete than ours they move finished and complete, gifted
with extensions of the senses we have lost or never attained, living by
voices we shall never hear. They are not brethren, they are not underlings,
they are other Nations, caught with ourselves in the net of life and time,
fellow prisoners of the splendour and travail of the earth.
Henry Beston, 1928
Nearly 30 years ago, in one of TV's most unforgettable broadcasts, Sir
David At-tenborough, crouching amidst a group of mountain gorillas in
Rwanda, said in an awe-struck whisper "There is more meaning and
mutual understanding in exchanging a glance with a gorilla than any other
animal I know."
The moment perfectly captured how people feel in the presence of gorillas
- not just reverence and awe, but a psychological and emotional connection
to another species. But how mutual is this feeling? Do gorillas recognize
a kindred spirit in us? Certainly captive gorillas can develop close reciprocal
bonds with humans that blur the species boundary. But these are animals
whose natural lives have been stolen, and for whom humans are surrogate
conspecifics. What about wild gorillas?
Consider the scientists who study the habituated mountain gorillas of
Rwanda, Uganda and Congo, like I did at the Karisoke Research Center in
the 1970s and 1980s. Of course, researchers do not aim to form bonds with
the animals, quite the opposite. We want to influence them as little as
possible, staying on the outside, looking in. But when you spend hour
after hour, day in and day out, in the midst of a gorilla group, you do
sometimes feel like you're one of the gang.
To some extent, this feeling is inevitable, given how many traits our
species share. So much of what gorillas do is familiar - the way they
move their hands, for example, or the expressions in their eyes. When
I crawled along their trail on my hands and knees, I was seeing their
world much the way they did. I particularly recall my sense of affinity
during long, cold rainstorms. Then, the gorillas and I got into the same
position, hunkering down with feet tucked underneath us, arms folded across
our chests, heads bowed, and shoulders hunched against the chilly, pelting
rain. Comrades in misery.
I must admit that part of me was drawn to the notion that I had been accepted
as one of the group. But I knew this was a fantasy. I think the gorillas
saw me, as they do all human observers, as an animal that spent a lot
of time following them around, but posed them no danger. I imagine that
they recognize something familiar in our ape-like qualities, but I saw
no evidence that they viewed me as another gorilla, or felt any kind of
"connection". I was largely irrelevant. When a gorilla gazed
into my face with its thoughtful brown eyes, it was looking at its reflection
in my glasses, not searching my soul.
We modern humans, living so far removed from Nature, are seduced by the
idea of being one with the animals, of being their friends. It's the allure
behind Tarzan and Mowgli. But our attachment to wild animals is one-way,
and of course, this is how it should be. Gorillas "accept" us
only in the sense that they cease to fear us. The ultimate privilege is
to have a wild gorilla turn its back on you. It rests on our shoulders
not to betray this trust.
Kelly Stewart
Other contributions:
Martha Robbins
Juichi Yamagiwa
James Byamukama and Stephen Asuma
Raymond Corbey
Colin Groves
Richard Johnstone-Scott
Overview
Dr. Kelly Stewart studied the gorillas
at Karisoke Research Center during the 1970s and early 1980s. For 10 years
she was editor of Gorilla Conservation News (now defunct). She is a Research
Associate in the Anthropology Department, University of California at
Davis.
Gorillas in general
- overview
Homepage |